Features of cochlear implantation in older adults

Background. Hearing impairment, according to official statistics, occurs in 14% of Russians aged 45–64 and 35% of residents over the age of 75 [1, 8, 11]. According to the forecasts of the World Health Organization (WHO), by 2050, almost 2.5 billion people will suffer from hearing problems to some extent and at least 700 million people will need rehabilitation services due to hearing loss [3, 18].

Aim. To study the features of cochlear implantation and evaluate the effectiveness of hearing and speech rehabilitation in older people.

Materials and methods. We observed 25 patients with a diagnosis of grade IV postlingual chronic bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, borderline with deafness (18 women and 7 men), who underwent cochlear implantation at the National Medical Research Center of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia. Before surgical treatment, all patients underwent a comprehensive audiological examination: tonal threshold audiometry, acoustic impedance measurement, registration of otoacoustic emission, registration of short-latency auditory evoked potentials, free sound field audiometry in hearing aids, speech audiometry in a free sound field in hearing aids. In the postoperative period, tonal threshold audiometry with a speech processor was performed. The mean age of patients at the time of cochlear implantation was 68.6 years.

Results. We have analyzed the effectiveness of the speech processor adjustment of a cochlear implant in a group of older patients in dynamics by performing tonal threshold audiometry in a free sound field.

Conclusion. Cochlear implantation in older adults can improve patients’ life quality, which is a criterion for meeting international standards of medical care.

1. Altman Ya.A., Tavartkiladze G.A. Guide to audiology. — M.: DMK Press, 2003. — 360 p. (In Rus.).

2. Balakina A.V., Litvak M.M., Viktorova N.V. Quality of life assessment in deaf patients after cochlear implantation: preliminary results // Actual issues in otorhinolaryngology: materials of regional conference ENT doctors in Siberia and Far East. — Blagoveschensk, 2012. (In Rus.).

3. Всемирная организация здравоохранения. Глухота и потеря слуха [сайт. URL: who.int/ru/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss (дата обращения: 18.09.2021).

4. Daikhes N.A., Balakina A.V., Machalov A.S. et al. Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation: patient selection criteria for second ear surgery. Science and innovation in medicine. — 2021. — Volume 6 (2). — pp. 13–19. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.35693/2500–1388–2021–6-2–13–19

5. Daikhes N.A., Guz E.V., Dergachev V.S. and other Register of diagnostics and treatment of hearing impairments in residents of the Russian Federation. // Russian otorhinolaryngology. — 2007. — No. 3 (28). — S. 16–19. (In Rus.).

6. Daikhes N.A., Machalov A.S., Kuznetsov A.O. and others. Register of persons with high degree of hearing impairment and deafness in the Russian Federation. // Otolaryngology. Eastern Europe. — 2021. — Volume 11 (3). — S. 348–355. (In Rus.). https://doi.org/10.34883/PI.2021.11.3.023

7. Daykhes, N. A. Legal and social issues in rehabilitation children with hearing disorders and deafness / N.A. Daykhes, O.S. Orlova, G.D. Tarasova//Russian otorhinolaryngology. — 2003. — №3. — P.55–61 (In Rus.).

8. Zagoryanskaya M.E. Importance of systematic epidemiological examination hearing disorders for its prevention and treatment // Russian otorhinolaryngology. — Application. 2007. — P. 134–139 (In Rus.).

9. Kolokolov O.V., Kuznetsov A.O., Machalov A.S. et al. Comparison of sound perception when using the strategies of coding the sound signal CIS and ACE by the cochlear implantation system. // Science and innovation in medicine. — 2021. — Volume 6 (3). — P.8–12. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.35693/2500–1388–2021–6-3–8-12.

10. Litvak M.M., Starokha A.V., Machalov A.S., Balakina A.V. Dynamic needs in audiological assistance in patients after cochlear implantation on early stages of rehabilitation// Russian otorhinolaryngology. — 2012. — № 3(58). P. 70–73. (In Rus.).

11. Lorio M. Relationships between generations in elderly society // Current problems in ageing population in the world: tendencies, perspectives, relationships between generations/ under the editorship ph.e. G.Sh. Bakhmetovoy and ph.e. L.V. Ivankovoy — M.: MAX Press, 2004. — P. 34–47. (In Rus.).

12. Machalov A.S. The functional state of the middle and inner ear in patients with sensorineural hearing loss after cochlear implantation: abstract of thesis. Cand. honey. sciences. Moscow, 2015.S. 23. (In Rus.).

13. Russian Federation national standart GOST R ISO 8253–1-2012. Acoustics. Audiometric testing methods. Part (In Rus.).

14. Rosset E. Population ageing. — M., 1968. — 256 p. (In Rus.).

15. Sapozhnikov Ya.M., Daikhes N.A., Machalov A.S. and others. Possibilities of broadband tympanometry in the differential diagnosis of some forms of hearing loss. // Russian otorhinolaryngology. — 2019. –T. 18.No. 6 (103). — S. 59–65. (In Rus.).

16. Grychynskiy M., Hoffmann B., Yaskiewicz M. et al. Guide to audiology and hearing aid. Moscow, 2009.235 p. (In Rus.).

17. Frank R. Lin, Wade W. Chien, Lingsheng Li, Danisa M. Clarrett, John K. Niparko, and Howard W. Francis. Cochlear implantation in older adults. Medicine 2012; 91: 229–241.

18. Freefield audiometry during cochlear implant fitting in children / M.M. Litvak [et al. // Cochlear implants international. — 2010. — Vol. 11, suppl. 11. — P. 442–443.

19. World Health Organisation. World Health Organisation Prevention of Blindness and Deafness (PBD) Program. Prevention of Deafness and Hearing Impairment. Grades for Hearing Impairment. URL: http://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/hearing_impairment_grades/en/index.html